- tops open-access journal ranking in several JCR categories – Science & research news | Frontiers
- Improving the peer-review process and editorial quality: key escaping the review and process in top scientific journals [PeerJ]
- The “Nature” of publishing. Are high journals distorting the scientific process? UNder the
- impact factor may be flawed important - Dasgupta - 2016 - BJU - Wiley Online Library
- News in 2016 Nature
- The problem journal level metrics | by Baird | Medium
- How gold open access may make worse
- Journals publishing top-cited articles. | Table
- Nature Index Preprints that are downloaded more often on bioRxiv tend to be published in journals with higher impact factors. https://go.nature.com/2T8uNLu | Facebook
- nature on Twitter: "Time to remodel the impact https://t.co/f7nTN91Of6 https://t.co/sV6entbQeV" / Twitter
- Controversial factor a heavyweight | Nature
- Challenge the impact factor | Biomedical Engineering
- Journal metrics | Portfolio
- Lior on Twitter: "The relative impact factor of glamour journals is 2.166 https://t.co/RQxrmw2J94 / Twitter
- The of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology published by... Scientific Diagram
- Nature Index 2016 | Nature
- Improving the peer-review process and editorial quality: key escaping the review and process in top scientific journals [PeerJ]
- PLOS - Wikipedia
- How to publish - Springer
- Beat it, impact factor! Publishing elite turns against controversial | Nature
- CJC's SCI Impact Factor reaches 4.111 2016
- Controversial factor a heavyweight | Nature
- Journal metrics | Portfolio
- Frontiers journals top of impact metrics – Science research news | Frontiers
- The Impact – Boston College Libraries Newsletter
- What Is a Good Factor for a Journal? | Scize Editing
- Journal metrics | Portfolio
- Beat it, impact factor! Publishing elite turns against controversial | Nature